Tag: europe

  • Brits defending the ECHR are in a tough spot.

    Brits defending the ECHR are in a tough spot. A lot of the distinction-drawing between the EU and ECHR feels to me like “if you’re explaining, you’re losing”. People see the CoE and EU institutions as part of a general European setup.

    In most places the distinction doesn’t matter much. It’s only in the UK where the EU has been declared the enemy that it’s important to draw the distinction – but the same spirit of international collaborative rule making runs through both so they *feel* similar.

    This is why pro-HR Brits are in a tough spot and why – as @Samfr said the other day – if the UK Gov wanted to stoop so low as to run a “kick out foreign judges” campaign the field is well set up for them.

    The answer longer-term has to be getting the UK back to its essential identity as part of that European democratic and liberal community – but it’s going to be a hard road, and will need a big culture shift against exceptionalism.

    Until then, it’ll be constant rearguard actions to defend even the most basic of rights for those in the UK. Labour also needs to start laying the groundwork for that culture shift, which it won’t be able do by pretending there’s a “Better Brexit” out there. @labour4europe

  • I’m getting a bit weary of this sort of thing.

    I’m getting a bit weary of this sort of thing. Are there people in the FR, DE etc political systems who think this? Probably. Is that the official position of any of those countries? No. Are they objectively behaving in pro-Putin ways? No. twitter.com/anders_aslund/…

    A few misquotes out of context (as is pointed out in the replies) don’t mean France is pressuring Ukraine to surrender. Slow action from Germany is not great but not a sign that they want Russia to win (listen to scholz’s speech last night).

    And the country that is actually blocking things – Hungary – never gets a mention. It’s all the bad old Western Europeans. (Or, for Brexiteers, the evil EU undermining heroic British leadership).

    Maybe I’m wrong, maybe stuff is happening behind the scenes that we don’t know about. But I would expect that to be sourced better than a few viral misquotes, unsupported by countries’ actual actions.

  • Great piece by @samfr in by @jburnmurdoch but Brexit didn’t make the UK a more tolerant…

    Great piece by @samfr in thread by @jburnmurdoch but Brexit didn’t make the UK a more tolerant nation, it was already becoming one. If Brexit vote were today it would fail. This is why Cameron’s self-serving narrative about having to call the referendum is nonsense. twitter.com/jburnmurdoch/s…

    He could have held out and attitudes would have shifted. Perhaps not as much, perhaps not as fast, but it was moving in the right direction.

    Admittedly, while Brexit is terrible for the UK and personally very painful, I also think that for European unity, it has not been a universally bad thing. It’s certainly opening up possibilities that UK would have blocked.

  • The Brexiteer wager is that no matter how outrageously they screw up, a combination of…

    The Brexiteer wager is that no matter how outrageously they screw up, a combination of right wing press, TV both-sidesing and basic nationalism will mean British people will just blame the bad EU. So far, it’s working for them.

    The logic of this is that they should be as outrageous as possible, because then the both-sidesing will be dragged even more towards “breaking our own agreements is good, actually”. This is also working for them.

    So, for all the Brexit project has failed and will continue to fail in terms of making anyone’s lives better, it is unfortunately delivering for the nationalist right (prop. V. Putin).

  • Alternative titles for mayors proposed by Michael Gove: Tell me you have a teenage crush…

    Alternative titles for mayors proposed by Michael Gove: Tell me you have a teenage crush on the US without telling me … etc.

    Surprised « sheriff » and « Boss Hogg » didn’t make the list.

    I would rather have a « President of the Collective Assembly of the Common Communities Commission » than « Governor of Norfolk ». Particularly a governor of Norfolk that doesn’t govern Norfolk.

  • C’est fini pour le PS alors.

    C’est fini pour le PS alors. Ces arguments sont exactement les mêmes que les Britanniques en Irlande du nord, Orban ou Kaczynski. Céder le respect des lois pour quelques conscriptions. Vraiment, c’est honteux. twitter.com/PierreLepel/st…

    « Désobéir la loi internationale dans un rayon spécifique et limité » – ces sont les mots du ministère Britannique en essayant d’éviter les conséquences du TCA en Irlande. Et que dirait un MAÉ socialiste en réponse? « Ah ouais c’est pas mal comme idée ça »?

    J’en ai marre avec les politicos français qui prétendent que l’Europe est un grand méchant ogre que la France ne peut jamais influencer. Qu’ils aillent voter pour Le Pen et son Frexit!

  • If Hungary result stays as it is, chances of meaningful reform of EU are strongly down.

    If Hungary result stays as it is, chances of meaningful reform of EU are strongly down. Several more years of Orban and PiS blocking action against each other will use up the Scholz-Macron window of opportunity. After it, Macron can’t run again.

    Might even lead to revival of the small-core Rutte model, either within or outside the current Treaty framework, particularly if HU continues down path of being the Russian asset in Council.

    All in all, it’s extremely depressing. I would say “ah well, that’s democracy”, but given what Fidesz have done to electoral system and media, it’s not that.

  • Links from the week of 14 March 2022

    Articles, reports and other links I shared on Twitter this week.

  • Links from the week of 21 February 2022

    Articles, reports and other links I shared on Twitter this week.

  • Just spoke at the #clubofvenice / @cap_com event here in beautiful @Toulouse @Occitanie.

    Just spoke at the #clubofvenice / @cap_com event here in beautiful @Toulouse @Occitanie. A few points from my notes on the topic of “placing the citizen at the centre of European debate” in this thread.

    1. Citizens don’t always know that they are in a European debate. They come into all sorts of conversations with their own expectations and experience, and don’t know (and shouldn’t need to know) which level of government is responsible for what.

    2. Policy makers come into European debate thinking about specific policies and reforms. That’s fine, but there needs to be two way interpretation between the connection, complex human stories that citizens bring and the organisationally-structured questions of institutions.

    3. This argues for a connected approach that allows for ideas to come from the bottom up and the top down, and for local conversations to be federated into European ones, and European information to be better used in local conversations.

    4. Civil society orgs can help with that. Locally, they provide the associative infrastructure and the trusted local voices that can ensure that participation reaches out wider. They also can run democratic processes themselves, so participation isn’t always about …

    …politics and partisan issues but everyday life as well.

    5. Internationally, civil society can provide networks of learning and support and trusted external validation for processes.

    6. But civil society also has needs, most of all for stability of resources. That’s not just about cash – we also need trained facilitators available locally, good information that we don’t have to design ourselves but is well-tailored to citizen needs.

    7. And finally we need the security that enables us to hire and train for the long-term rather than just 12- or 24-month contracts.

    8. Long-term participation is only going to be possible if we are able to hold on to participants to update them, train and validate facilitators and designers to ensure that processes can run well and be started at short notice.

    9. And that requires us as civil society to work closer together, but also governments at every level to think about how they can support this whole space in a holistic way.

    10. Funding for orgs like @demsoc will always be triangular – foundational (European grants, foundations, other big patient resources); project-based (quasi-commercial); and members. At the moment too much focus is on the second point in the triangle.

    11. Horizon Europe is promising in its focus on democracy but even with several million euro it’s still just one funder among many – we really need to think about how we can connect up the initiatives – and better connect up the networks that help deliver it.