Tag: tech

  • Reading: The Nerd Reich

    Finished Gil Durán’s The Nerd Reich, which is a history of the last twenty years or so in Silicon Valley, and how the PayPal Mafia and other technologists turned against governments and liberalism.

    I am perhaps closer to democratic decay conversations that the average reader, but there wasn’t much in here I didn’t know in one form or another, stitched together into a multi-year story of how Peter Thiel and the people around him reached the positions of wealth and power that they have today.

    The title will tell you this isn’t a fawning biography, Durán – a journalist and political adviser to a number of Democrats – is rightly angry and concerned about what is being done to American democracy.

    However, where the book didn’t land for me is the absence of the rest of the world. Not just in the usual American sense of no other country really being given any attention, but Durán’s hyperfocus on two dozen ultra-rich connected individuals who are driving this movement.

    For a political operative, in particular, it was odd to see nothing – even in the final chapter – that considered why or how these people had built what political following they had; where the fractures might be within the network or – more important – between these billionaires and the wider Trump/MAGA/Techbro movement.

    In particular, the last chapter, looking at the future, seemed to be very light on solutions other than “stop having billionaires”. Where were the mobilisation strategies? What are the political messages that need to be used? How can communities come together?

    A Great Villain theory of history is not so very different from a Great Man theory of history – both over-emphasise the individual, the personal relationships, and the historical destiny of the people involved. Both make contingency and chance seem like divine ordinance.

    If you believe that World Historical Figures exist, perhaps Thiel is one – one for the age of post-democratic technology. What comes across in the book, though, is how far he is from bringing a Fichtian synthesis to contending visions of the world. Rather, he is someone who is driven only by one dark, semi-apocalyptic vision, “made darker still by the lights of a perverted science”, as Churchill said.

    Thiel’s politics and the companies he invested in influence billions of people every day, but those billions of people – at least, those in democratic countries – can push back and cut them down to size. That they have not yet does not mean they cannot, or that they never will.

    Unfortunately the Nerd Reich doesn’t give us many clues on what we need to do to make that happen.

  • No digital boarding passes, physical check in only.

    No digital boarding passes, physical check in only. And here’s the queue. @FlyingBrussels

    @FlyingBrussels no staff around to help? No prioritisation by departure times? It’s taken me 20 minutes to get 10 metres down the line and I’m definitely missing this flight.

    @FlyingBrussels but hey it’s only the first time seeing my sister and niece in six months! No biggie!

  • 10 ways to make the best of the Conference on the Future of Europe #cofoe #futureofeurope…

    10 ways to make the best of the Conference on the Future of Europe #cofoe #futureofeurope – a thread.

    Too many presidents. Too little time. People have been pretty hard on the leaked plans for the Conference on the Future of Europe #CoFoE – but it can still make a positive difference to the emerging European Democracy.

    1. Make #CoFoE experimental. This isn’t going to be writing a new European treaty, so use the opportunity to test different participative approaches on big questions, including how to join up different processes at different levels.

    2. Listening means acting. The response to the European Citizen Consultation of 2018-9 was a sentence in a summit document. The Institutions should flesh out how they will respond to #cofoe concretely – not just promise to read the answers carefully.

    3. Start building civil society links now. Seeming irrelevance leads to civil society inaction leading to minimal response. Turn it into a virtuous circle by making clear how civil society can help – and how #cofoe matters to their goals, not just the EU institutions’.

    4. Get officials involved in person. Myths around citizen participation are more easily dispelled by taking part in an event than by reading a report – and #cofoe can help officials learn how they can use participation in their own work too.

    5. Set a clear pathway for citizen agenda setting. “Citizens are free to raise other issues” is fine, but it mustn’t be “raise it to be ignored”. Online idea generation should have a clear pathway from idea to #CoFoE agenda.

    6. Run past the deadline. Spring 2022 is soon – but it’s less of a problem if the Institutions plan now to continue the approach beyond the deadline, and show how issues not addressed in #cofoe can be picked up later, in the run up to the 2024 European Parliament elections.

    7. Leave a legacy. By the time #cofoe draws to a close, the programmes selected as part of the Green Deal to create infrastructure for citizen participation in Europe will be starting up. Pass on citizen networks, tech platforms and relevant conversations from one to the next.

    8. Let citizens mark the homework. As in France, let a group of citizens who have been involved in #CoFoE review what the Institutions do with it. It may lead to a few uncomfortable comments, but it shows that this is a meaningful process.

    9. Ensure that technology is open. The tools created for #CoFoE need to be shared widely. Multilingual dialogue processes on a common European digital framework – that could really speed up the developmed of a connected European democracy.

    10. Build the foundations for trust. The institutions need to trust the answers they receive from #CoFoE. Citizens need to trust that processes are run fairly and without outside influence.

    The creation of trust is a long-term effort, longer-term than a single year or #CoFoE. But as the Hippocratic oath says, first do no harm. Make sure that processes are open, trusted and used, and that facilitation and design is independent or at least independently verified.

    Then, as citizen participation at European level expands, as it will in coming years, the #cofoe will have a legacy to be proud of.

  • Links from the week of 22 February 2021

    Articles, reports and other links I shared on Twitter this week.

  • Links from the week of 27 July 2020

    Articles, reports and other links I shared on Twitter this week.

  • Astonishing figures on #bepol social media spend in @LeVif: leader of far right Vlaams…

    Astonishing figures on #bepol social media spend in @LeVif: leader of far right Vlaams Belang spent €469k on personal page ads Mar-Jun. All other party leaders together: €410k. Flemish nationalists & far right spent €1,7m. All other parties together: €0,9m

    This is so one sided it’s embarrassing. No wonder the Flemish polls are showing huge leads for the far right.

    Et que font les partis francophones? Les dépenses totales des francophones ne s’élèvent qu’à €117k dans €2,6m. PTB exclu, le parti le plus dépensier (@PSofficiel) débourse 23 fois moins que le Belang.

    Il peut s’agir d’une sorte d’échec multi-dimensionelle qu’ils jouent au Boulevard de l’Empereur. On espère…

  • Links from the week of 12 August 2019

    Articles, reports and other links I shared on Twitter this week.

  • Links from the week of 12 August 2019

    Articles, reports and other links I shared on Twitter this week.

  • Links from the week of 1 April 2019

    Articles, reports and other links I shared on Twitter this week.

  • Links from the week of 1 April 2019

    Articles, reports and other links I shared on Twitter this week.