Tag: europe

  • Thought provoking evening last night at the launch of @PEHumaine #PourUneEchelleHumaine…

    Thought provoking evening last night at the launch of @PEHumaine #PourUneEchelleHumaine (For a Human Scale) in Paris. It’s a collection of essays by a group of 89-generation (so, 30something) activists and politicians. 1/x

    The core of their ideas is a three-point approach covering ecology, democratic renewal (this being France, they used the word republicanism) and altruism. They are also very post-party-politics, though you’ll guess from the topics that it’s broadly left/green. 2/

    The three point programme I mostly like. It’s self-evident, to me at least, that without some kind of common programme around just transition, democracy and quality public services parties to the left of centre can’t win. 3/

    I also liked that there was real practical experience in the room. Politicians and activists who had done things on estates, not just policy position taking. Respect for that. Politics is action on the ground, not rinsing your enemies on Twitter. 4/

    Another strong point was their narrative about democratic renewal and citizenship, on which deputy mayor of @nantesfr, @3asseh has a great track record – again, concrete work not theory. 5/

    I also liked the (overall) youth and energy of the group. Many of them will be in the next or next but one round of political leaders and they are definitely preparing now for the challenges of 2030/40. 6/

    Naturally, I had some things I didn’t agree with. “Altruism” was I thought quite a weak word for the third element of the trio. It has echoes of 19th century liberalism to me, and made me think of Attlee’s description of charity as “a cold loveless thing” 7/

    Why not “empathy” or “justice”? I get the aim – an effective state with a strong moral core focused on justice and good public services – and I understand the need to set this up outside a statist or technocratic argument, even in France. But “altruism” is surely just part of it

    It was a much more geographically mixed group than a lot of Parisian policy events, but it was still extremely Franco-français. Europe as a geographical entity got a couple of mentions, Europe as a political entity was invisible. 9/

    I understand why – and of course my work is in Brussels so I think about the European level more than most – BUT these battles have to be won everywhere or they will be lost everywhere and I would have liked to see an idea for how this spreads beyond France.

    There will also be a challenge to make this approach additive not subtractive. At a time of culture wars (Zemmour, a probable far-right presidential candidate) politics is a conversation about splits and differences. Is eco-demo-justice strong enough to unite

    Particularly when it comes to the trade offs on climate and public services between different groups? You can see the fault lines – urban/rural, climate/industrial policy – which can be waved away for now, but not for ever.

    I also – and this is perhaps the fact that I am very very old – wondered about how their narrative of democratic renewal connected with their clear desire to stay away from party politics. Traditional parties and politicians were dunked on, as usual, but

    I don’t know how you avoid engaging with them if you want to get things done, or hold power. A thousand community actions is good, but even a strong associative layer will struggle if it doesn’t have a method of taking elective political power.

    Maybe elective politics will go away (I had a very enjoyable debate with @ClaudiaChwalisz about this over dinner after – I suspect she is right that it’s doomed in the medium term, but I don’t want to give up on parties quite yet)

    However it’s not going anywhere for bid, and I wondered what this group hoped for. I didn’t know whether it was intended as a ginger group, to put the fear into centre-left pols and get them to be more radical. It certainly wasn’t an offer to the left parties

    But more of a bracing challenge. A little bit of it felt quite En Marche-y – innovating a political party out of an intersection of political views that work. As we’ve seen, though, these personalised parties are mayflies and find it hard to implant locally

    It would work for a national campaign but if they want a street-by-street remaking of French politics and policy it will only be through local action and local politics.

    But these are generally quibbles. The eco-demo-justice trio is a strong start. I would personally have liked to hear more about power (power/agency and climate transition are all of politics in the next ten years, I think).

    But I respect and admire the effort of putting this together, and there is a lot here to like. Keep an eye on what happens next with @PEHumaine and I commend it to my Brussels friends in @PES_PSE @GreensEFA.

    Particular shout outs for @3asseh @SrhBenbelkacem and @olivia_fortin for their speeches and @GuillaumeMayor for inviting @RaphaelPouye and me, and the follow-up conversation over dinner.

    Plus on a personal note it was a huge pleasure to be back at an in-person political event again. That’s the sort of échelle humaine everyone can get behind.

  • I think this is a good doorstep line but a dangerous direction.

    I think this is a good doorstep line but a dangerous direction. First, Hungary is not the Hungarian government. Millions of Hungarians are neutral or hostile to Orban, and creating a situation in which “the liberals” are threatening them with loss of their EU rights twitter.com/vonderburchard…

    and finances will not help anyone. Second, don’t threaten what you can’t do. No-one can force Hungary out of the EU, and they won’t leave voluntarily, so this just looks futile. Third, liberal values are also contended within the Benelux (hello FvD, VB etc) and other liberal

    countries. It is better to fight for them across Europe rather than othering one or two “backward” countries for their most extreme positions and telling them they have to conform or leave the club. Fourth, human rights are personal rights, not the rights of states.

    The battle for them can only be won if we base the argument on the solidarity of *people* across Europe. So, in summary, this is an Orban problem, and a problem of right wing nationalism, not a Hungarian problem or an Eastern problem.

  • This is the perfect example of Dominic Cummings being a great campaigner but an appalling…

    This is the perfect example of Dominic Cummings being a great campaigner but an appalling politician. « Turkey is joining » is non-deniable enough to whip up FUD but is not *usefully* true, a fact you can base any policy decision on. twitter.com/Dominic2306/st…

    It ironic that someone whose constant theme is that society is too complex and fast moving to be governed by the dullards in the civil service or Brussels has as his only concrete achievement something that is based on deliberate « true enough » obfuscation.

    The problem with « true enough » campaigning being that it gets you the win but gives you neither the intellectual framework nor the alliances to make any concrete progress. If you’re anti-EU I guess that leaving the EU is a sort of progress but

    it’s the progress of ripping out an old kitchen … your sense of achievement ends with a heap of rubble, some broken pipes, and no kitchen.

  • Spotting someone saying that we need to write “an [deleted] strategy for the 21st…

    Spotting someone saying that we need to write “an [deleted] strategy for the 21st century”, and thinking “bit late, no?”. Given I’ll be 80 in 2053, my new aim is that my last public policy contribution should be a strategy for the 22nd century.

    (After reinventing democracy in Europe for the 21st century, earlier on).

    Glad that I lived through the golden age of think-tank vision report titles that was 2020.

  • Links from the week of 31 May 2021

    Articles, reports and other links I shared on Twitter this week.

  • A few replies to this are « I don’t suppose Brexiters will mind being shut out of France…

    A few replies to this are « I don’t suppose Brexiters will mind being shut out of France » – well maybe not, some. But anyone who wants the UK back and playing a full role in Europe won’t fall for the trap of tarring all Brexiteers with that brush. twitter.com/Otto_English/s…

    It is a trap, to believe that the charlatans in the political/media class and the barely sane ranters on here are the genuine voice of those who voted Leave. They are no more that than someone with a whole-body Thierry Henry tattoo is the voice of football fandom.

    There is an addressable middle. The people who believed (as some of my Leave friends did) that nothing would really change and the NHS would get more money. Or that there would be more jobs, or national pride, without any costs to pay.

    I don’t blame people much for thinking that, it was what a group of politicians were telling them and for many people one group of politicians is much the same as another. But now the challenge for British Europeans is to make those disappointed voters – and there are a lot –

    connect their disappointment to British false promises not spiteful Europeans who hate British freedom. The majority of the print media will blame Europeans, some because they are proto-fascist by sympathy, others because it sells. The current government will

    reinforce that, because it’s in their interest, and the current opposition won’t do anything about it, it seems. So the least we can do is not fall into the trap of claiming that Brexiteers want to ban travel to France. That sets up the maniacs as the mainstream. They aren’t.

  • Links from the week of 24 May 2021

    Articles, reports and other links I shared on Twitter this week.

  • Also: people expect more of the EU that it can do; don’t remember that Hungary *still*…

    Also: people expect more of the EU that it can do; don’t remember that Hungary *still* has a veto on all foreign policy action; don’t like that you have to start by expressing concern before you can do anything else. twitter.com/melissakchan/s…

    It’s entirely possible that EU will be too weak on Belarus. But it doing the right thing and doing the wrong thing look the same at this point – expressing serious concern, demanding explanations etc.

    It’s also entirely possible that antidemocratic governments like Hungary’s will veto a strong position it’s further evidence of Orban’s unfitness for office, and the burning need to abolish foreign policy vetoes.

  • More on Belgium #4regions in @lesoir tonight

    More on Belgium #4regions in @lesoir tonight: plus.lesoir.be/367939/article…

    There isn’t an answer that doesn’t have inherent problems – with #4regions there will have to be a federal level, there will have to be inter-entity co-operation on culture, education and other things.

    Then the questions of cash arise again – not just the question of tax revenue across entities, but also solidarity between regions. Will a move away from inter-regional solidarity be overtaken by increasing EU fiscal consolidation? #4regions

    My unexamined gut feel is in favour of smaller entities with high solidarity, combined with a federal level that’s powerful on strategy and rule setting but doesn’t deliver much – combined with multilingualism in politics and public services.

    But the state reform more than anything is about balancing different political priorities rather than technocratically perfect solutions. That’s why it’s interesting that the proposals start from a citizen engagement exercise.

  • Links from the week of 12 April 2021

    Articles, reports and other links I shared on Twitter this week.