Category: Twitter

  • Links from the week of 24 August 2020

    Articles, reports and other links I shared on Twitter this week.

  • Links from the week of 17 August 2020

    Articles, reports and other links I shared on Twitter this week.

  • Links from the week of 10 August 2020

    Articles, reports and other links I shared on Twitter this week.

  • Links from the week of 3 August 2020

    Articles, reports and other links I shared on Twitter this week.

  • This would be true in a world where Brexit weren’t a coalition between xenophobic…

    This would be true in a world where Brexit weren’t a coalition between xenophobic nationalists and 51st-stater free marketeers. The UK will veer between US (51st stater), autarky (nationalists) and EU (anti-Brexiteers) for a decade or so. twitter.com/b_judah/status…

    The realities of geography probably means it ends up closer to the EU, if not fully in the more integrated Union that @gideonrachman discusses. However, the 51st-staters will spend next few years trying to entrench things like US regulatory standards to hinder that.

    Though even if there were an outbreak of grown-up politics, the UK wouldn’t be at the *centre* of a revived western alliance, it would be the third wheel of the bike, or in Boris Johnson terms, the Marcus Aemilius Lepidus of a western triumvirate.

  • Links from the week of 27 July 2020

    Articles, reports and other links I shared on Twitter this week.

  • Links from the week of 20 July 2020

    Articles, reports and other links I shared on Twitter this week.

  • Today’s #euco discussions on the #eubudget and #NextGenerationEU fund show that Europe…

    Today’s #euco discussions on the #eubudget and #NextGenerationEU fund show that Europe needs a Madisonian moment to go with its (not-quite) Hamiltonian one.

    Case number 1: @MinPres Mark Rutte saying that the Dutch government wants guarantees about the effectiveness of reforms in “southern” countries.

    Case number 2: Victor Orban’s parliament insisting that there should be no conditionality on rule of law, and that the Article 7 procedure against Hungary should be dropped in return for a budget deal.

    There are obviously lots of competing demands in the #eubudget process – but these are the two that clarify the problem. In both cases a member state is trying to push its own view of the world on others, with the budget process as a tool.

    Why does this matter? Because the #NextGenerationEU COVID recovery fund means the EU will be borrowing as a Union, and the proposals on how the money gets paid back may mean more EU-level taxes. That’s what’s been called the “Hamiltonian moment” for EU finances.

    (It isn’t quite, because Hamilton took on the existing debts of the states, this is just creating new common debt, but you can see how one might gradually lead to another).

    However, Rutte and Orban show that common financing won’t work if the politics of EU finance stay stuck in “what I pay and what I get” mode. Rutte is quite right that the Dutch public deserve democratic oversight of the money they are spending

    but quite wrong that this oversight should pass through him. It should go through the Parliament and the executive at EU level – particularly if they are also raising the money to pay for it.

    This isn’t just a EU issue, it’s about accountability and efficiency. If the EU institutions have power to raise funds, but national governments get the blame, it’s an invitation to wasteful spending on boondoggles and pet projects.

    Similarly, if Orban or other autocratic governments can hold budgetary processes hostage for their antidemocratic crusades, illiberal cronyism will run rampant.

    “Treaty Change” is the longest four letter word in Brussels, but it’s time for a serious conversation about how democracy and accountability need to go alongside new debt raising and tax raising powers. (end)

  • Links from the week of 13 July 2020

    Articles, reports and other links I shared on Twitter this week.

  • Astonishing figures on #bepol social media spend in @LeVif: leader of far right Vlaams…

    Astonishing figures on #bepol social media spend in @LeVif: leader of far right Vlaams Belang spent €469k on personal page ads Mar-Jun. All other party leaders together: €410k. Flemish nationalists & far right spent €1,7m. All other parties together: €0,9m

    This is so one sided it’s embarrassing. No wonder the Flemish polls are showing huge leads for the far right.

    Et que font les partis francophones? Les dépenses totales des francophones ne s’élèvent qu’à €117k dans €2,6m. PTB exclu, le parti le plus dépensier (@PSofficiel) débourse 23 fois moins que le Belang.

    Il peut s’agir d’une sorte d’échec multi-dimensionelle qu’ils jouent au Boulevard de l’Empereur. On espère…